Adrift historic tug awaits rescue on Ardentinny sandbank

The Golden Cross this afternoon at low tide.

Vintage tugboat Golden Cross is this afternoon lodged on a sandbank off Ardentinny beach. The historic ship which has been moored off Ardentinny since April appears to have broken free from its mooring overnight and drifted towards the beach. According to a villager, an MOD police launch was seen in the vicinity of the marooned boat early this morning. See the LochLongCam.com webcam for latest live pictures.

Planning, semantics or something else?

 

Ardentinny Hotel – A brighter future?

[pullquote]THERE WILL BE A COMMUNITY COUNCIL OPEN MEETING
ON TUESDAY 17TH JULY 2012 AT 7.30. P.M. AT THE VILLAGE HALL TO DISCUSS THE PLANNING APPLICATION. ALL WELCOME[/pullquote]

At a meeting held in the Village Hall on 17 July 2012, it was initially unclear if the issue under discussion was one of planning, semantics or something else. A group of 24 residents, both permanent and semi-permanent, gathered last night in the village hall in response to the meeting notice (see sidebar). As the meeting was about to begin, one community councillor said it could not go ahead as it lacked a quorum of community councillors. This was challenged by the three other community councillors present, which included the Acting Chair, who ascerted that it was not a Community Council meeting but a public meeting. Many of the attending public were also of the opinion that it was a public meeting while one expressed the view that they thought it had been called by the Community Council as it had a mandate to elicit the public view before responding to the National Park with regard to the planning application in respect of the refurbishment of Ardentinny Hotel.

As all Community Council meetings are open to the public, except where confidential matters are to be discussed, it is understandable that the meeting notice could be interpreted in different ways. The reality will doubtless be revealed in the minutes of the Community Council meeting that decided to call this additional meeting in respect of this particular planning application. However, what was more important to those in attendance was that the meeting proceed and reach a conclusion.

The Chair conveyed the apologies of the current owners of the hotel/planning permission applicants. He also said that he expected their architect to attend to answer any questions on the planning application. However, s/he was not present. He went on to ask if any of those present had any objections to the planning application. One resident responded by saying that he had already written to the Planning Department in support of the application. Noone raised any objections. Only one resident raised concerns about parking and traffic safety and the Chair suggested that that might be conveyed personally to the Planning Department as it was not supported by others present.

There was discussion regarding the legality of the Community Council conveying the results of the meeting to the National Park Planning Dept., given the unresolved issue of whether or not the meeting was Community Council or public led. It was advised and agreed that any individual Community Councillor, could convey the results of the consultation to the National Park Planning Dept. while members of the public could also personally communicate their support or objections.

For further information on Community Councils’ remit and their role with regard to planning applications see
http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/1996/03/18415/28371.

To view the Ardentinny Hotel planning application and supporting documentation see http://www.lochlomond-trossachs.org/planning/online-planning-information/menu-id-595.html.

Ardentinny.org: Dunoon Observer ‘Correction’

In its 9 June edition the Dunoon Observer copied and printed our article ‘MOD needs to listen to its neighbours in Ardentinny says Argyll MSP‘ almost in its entirety and without our knowledge or permission. The Observer also added its own erroneous introduction to the article without checking with the source of the article.

We have since received an emailed apology from the sub-editor responsible and the newspaper has printed a ‘correction’ on page two of its 15th June edition. Although not stated in the ‘correction’, we would like to reiterate to our visitors and those who contributed to our article, that at no time did we give permission to the Dunoon Observer to lift and reprint our copyrighted material from Ardentinny.org.

MOD needs to listen to its neighbours in Ardentinny says Argyll MSP

Given recent media reports of safety concerns at HM naval Base Clyde, of which Coulport is part, plus the sounding of the emergency alarms outwith the regular Monday morning alarm tests, we contacted the Ministry of Defence with the suggestion that the Coulport facility liaise with Ardentinny.org and other neighbouring communities to provide regular information on these emergency alarms. We received a response from the Superintendent Weapons, RNAD Coulport, Mr. John Spy.

Mr. Spy said “I’m happy to confirm that the general alarm was activated on the 10th of May. This was caused by a system fault, and, as you would expect, the fault was rigorously investigated before the depot stood-down at around 19:00 hrs.” He also confirmed that the alarm system is tested each Monday at 10:00am.

Mr. Spy continued “RNAD Coulport has a single general alarm, which triggers automatic and generic responses to a variety of possible incidents from security alerts to fire alarms, consequently it is used as trigger to a variety of exercises throughout the year as the depot demonstrates its response to a variety of regulatory bodies. I do though appreciate that on a still day the sound of the alarm will carry to Ardentinny. [pullquote]Such openness should be the norm, not the exception..
Michael Russell MSP[/pullquote]

I can appreciate your concern given the occasions when elements of the media report misleadingly and inaccurately on safety at HM Naval Base Clyde. I would like to assure you, and members of the Ardentinny community, that the Naval Base makes safety its single top priority. The Naval Base, of which Coulport is an integral part, is a Nuclear Authorised site and is subject to regulation by the Defence Nuclear Safety Regulator and other regulatory bodies. Quite simply, if HM Naval Base Clyde did not meet these bodies’ stringent standards then we would not be permitted to operate. The site never compromises on safety and has an effective culture of continuous safety improvement.”

In further correspondence with RNAD Coulport we reiterated our request that the communities surrounding the base be made aware (after the event) as to the reason for each alarm alert, whether they be exercises or actual incidents. Such an initiative by RNAD Coulport would provide greater transparency for its operations and the concerns as to the safety of those living in the surrounding area who, until now, have been kept in the dark regarding these alerts.

Local MSP Michael Russell said “The MoD needs to listen to its neighbours in Ardentinny. I strongly support the suggestion from the community that prompt publication of the reasons for alarms and other worrying – and annoying – activity should take place on the community website and in other local media. Such openness should be the norm, not the exception and I hope management at RNAD Coulport will quickly take up the idea. I will be writing to the MoD to support it.’

Newly elected Cowal Councillor Gordon Blair said “I will discuss this issue with my colleagues in the Helensburgh and Lomond area to check if there is any such arrangement there for the people of Cove etc. Your suggestion seems reasonable simply on a customer service perspective and I will investigate the possibility of getting someone round to the Community Council, for example, from Coulport to discuss the issues you have.”

We understand that a representative from the MOD used to attend Ardentinny Community Council meetings and that a member of Ardentinny Community Council has been in contact with HM Naval Base Clyde requesting that this be reinstated.

Argyll & Bute Council Elections 2012 – Cowal Ward 6 results

1. Gordon Blair (SNP)

2. Bruce Marshall (Ind)

3. Alex McNaughton (Ind)

First preference votes received for each candidate:

William Gordon Blair (SNP) 570
Alex McNaughton (Ind) 543
Bruce Marshall (Ind) 375
Ron Simon (SNP) 353
Lewis MacDonald (Con) 343
Stephen Johnston (Ind) 282
Chris Talbot (Ind) 169
Russell Weir (Ind) 151
Chris Lambert (Ind) 126

Turnout was 49.86%.
40 rejected papers.