Ardentinny Housing Rethink.
Dunoon Observer & Argyllshire Standard.

Related posts:

1. National Park Board unanimously accepts Park’s recommendation to remove Ardentinny housing proposal from Local Plan
2. Ardentinny ammunition story carried by national press
3. Ardentinny – In the Media

Some of the community volunteers who participated in organising the petition this week.

Loch Lomond & The Trossachs National Park Board unanimously accepted the Park Authority’s recommendation to remove its Ardentinny housing proposal from the Local Plan. The Plan in its entirety will now go to the Reporter and, depending on the Reporter’s decision, it will be adopted or amended accordingly.

This remarkable decision was taken at the Board’s meeting at National Park Headquarters in Balloch on the 23 June 2010. It was the culmination of a 17-month-long campaign by local residents in objection to the Park’s proposal to build housing south of Lochview in Ardentinny and resulted in the Park Authority’s suggestion to make a ‘significant change’ to the finalised Draft Local Plan. That change being:

‘Ardentinny – H2 Site South of Lochview

Considering the number of objections and comments received regarding this site, it is recommended to remove H2 from Schedule 1: Housing Allocations. It is also recommended that the Ardentinny Proposals Map is amended to remove the allocation and the settlement boundary adjusted to follow the A880 road so the site lies outwith the boundary.

It is noted that under Policy HOUS3 New Housing Development Adjacent to Settlements, this site could come forward for development subject to the plan’s policies. If in the event that a planning application came forward for housing development on this site, community consultation would be undertaken as set out in the Planning etc. (Scotland) Act 2006.’

(Report NPA/02/2010/06 on the Consultation on the Finalised Draft Local Plan. Stuart Mearns, Forward Planning Manager).

On presenting the Consultation Document on the Finalised Draft Local Plan, Gordon Watson, Director of Planning and Rural Development, explained that the recommendation for change to the Housing Proposal for Ardentinny was due to the large number of objections from residents to the proposal together with the Petition sent to all Board members which recorded a ‘significant number of signatories’.

Councillor Bruce Marshall asked if there were any plans to develop housing on another site in Ardentinny. Gordon Watson replied that they had identified other sites for housing in Cowal but not in Ardentinny. Later, Board Member, Russell Bruce asked about the significance of the recommendation to adjust the settlement boundary. Gordon Watson responded by saying that it was necessary to move the site south of Lochview outside the settlement boundary otherwise there would always be a predisposition to use it for the development of housing.

This result is undoubtedly due to the spirit and determination of the Ardentinny community whose resolve and staying power have been exemplary. A record of its campaign and how it evolved can be found at the following pages:

http://ardentinny.org/category/phousing/

http://old.ardentinny.org/community/localplan3.html

http://old.ardentinny.org/community/localplan2.html

http://old.ardentinny.org/community/localplan1.html

Copy of letter which accompanied 96 signature petition to National Park Authority (pdf 70kb).

Related posts:

1. Consultation Visit to National Park Headquarters
2. Our communities and The National Park
3. Finalised Draft Local Plan available in Village Hall

Related posts:

1. National Park Authority’s Report on Consultation
2. National Park Members Election 2010 – Update
3. Our communities and The National Park

Related posts:

1. National Park Board unanimously accepts Park’s recommendation to remove Ardentinny housing proposal from Local Plan
2. Consultation Visit to National Park Headquarters
3. Your Feedback on the Public Meeting with National Park Authority

The relevant Local Plan Ardentinny map pages can also be downloaded from here (pdf). Complete Plan pages can be downloaded from here.

Related posts:

1. Village Hall Open Day
2. National Park Board unanimously accepts Park’s recommendation to remove Ardentinny housing proposal from Local Plan
3. New Village Hall Committee Appointed

29 of the 50 attendees at the Public Meeting, held in Ardentinny on 26th January, completed feedback forms which were provided by The Community Council. The results are as follows:

Question 1. Were you given sufficient information to understand the planning issue and its possible impact on the village in order to attend and take part in this meeting?
26 responded Yes
3 responded No

Question 2. Did you consider the Community Council and Working Group conducted an equal and fair meeting, allowing important points to be raised and answered?
28 responded Yes
1 responded Don’t know

Question 3. Did you consider the National Park statements satisfactory or inadequate?
4 responded Satisfactory
25 responded Inadequate

Question 4. Do you wish the Community Council and Working Group to continue to monitor this planning issue?
29 responded Yes

Further comments were also invited and those submitted were:
- The representatives of the National Park seem to know little about the area.
- Further clarification for criteria required for ‘Social Housing’
- How are Housing Associations selected for the development?
- No information on the environmental impact.
- Good meeting re-affirming a substantial majority against the proposed housing.
- Thin end of the wedge – 10 houses initially, then what? Not convinced of sincerity of NP to take into consideration feelings of the majority present.
- Disappointed that the elected National Park Councillor does not feel he has to support the overwhelming view of the meeting.
- Very pleased with the way the meeting was conducted.
- Majority at meeting voted NO to new houses in Ardentinny.
- I think there were some questions that revealed a lack of democracy and real consultation and concern for local communities and their sustainability and health.

Related posts:

1. Residents express their views at public meeting
2. Consultation Visit to National Park Headquarters
3. [19:37:26] National Park CEO at Kilmun meeting

Related posts:

1. Ardentinny – in the media
2. Ardentinny in the local press…
3. Dunoon Observer confirms MoD responsible for lost ammo

A 50-strong gathering of Ardentinny residents expressed dismay and more than a little frustration at the Public Meeting held in the village hall on Tuesday 26th January. Dismay at the continued, albeit scaled down, proposal to build 10, as opposed to, 36 affordable housing ‘units’ in a village with no employment opportunities and a distinct lack of amenities. Frustration at the perceived lack of transparency and willingness by The National Park Authority to respond to officially posed questions and expressed concerns.

The meeting was chaired by Community Council Convener, Val Kennedy. The National Park Authority was represented by Gordon Watson, Director of Planning and Rural Development; Terry Levinthal, Chair of the Planning Committee; and Diana Worthy, Planning Officer. Gordon Watson opened the meeting with a presentation on where they are in the planning process. He stated that the driver for their current housing policy is concern at population decline within The National Park and, in particular, the decline of householders and people of working age.

Community Councillor and Working Group Member, Dennis Gower, spoke on behalf of the Community Council. He noted that of the total responses the Park had received, over 20% had come from Ardentinny and he said that while the village was not against housing full stop, the majority was against housing in Ardentinny in its present state. He commented that the Community Council had sent a formal, reasonably detailed response re the Draft Plan in which they asked 10 clear succinct questions which they thought deserved an answer or some kind of reasonable explanation. This has never been received and the Community Council shared the Working Group’s frustrations at the stalling tactics of the National Park when asked to provide answers to their questions and concerns. He also quoted from the Scottish Government’s response to the Consultation in which it said that the National Park had not provided a clear justification for the allocation of housing within particular areas, of which Ardentinny is one. He thanked the Park Authority for finally agreeing to come along to the Public Meeting and asked that they give full consideration to what the residents had to say and to adhere to the primary aims of the National Park which are to conserve and enhance the culture and heritage of the area. He also asked that they apply a great deal more common sense, which received loud applause.

Why Ardentinny?
Argyll and Bute Councillor and Conservative Parliamentary Candidate, Gary Mulvanay asked the question ‘Of all the places in this big National Park, why Ardentinny?’, particularly when there was such a clear steer from the community that they did not want this proposal. He asked what the driver was? For example, was it people in work who needed housing in the area? Councillor Bruce Marshall responded by saying that, in his youth, Ardentinny was a vibrant, viable village with jobs, kids, a school and post office which have all gone because there are no young people. He suggested that now the village was dying on its feet. One resident suggested that it was a work thing, not a housing thing. Gordon Watson said the driver was the housing need identified by Argyll and Bute Council and that within Argyll and Bute there was a shortage of suitable sites. They had identified this site in Ardentinny as one that would be suitable. This was an issue that became increasingly more obvious as the meeting progressed, i.e., that Ardentinny had been earmarked for affordable housing more because of the availability of a suitable site, rather than in response to a housing need, particular to Ardentinny.

A vibrant village not a dying one
There was strong objection from the floor that Ardentinny was a dying village. One resident cited the vast amount of talent in the village, small businesses, artists and crafts people and said that, while Ardentinny is a changed village, it is a very vibrant, going forward village. A view which was strongly supported by the majority.

Apology and lessons to learn
One of the residents reiterated the concern that the Park Authority had not responded to the questions posed by the Community Council and suggested that, had they been more open and provided answers to questions, it would possibly have saved a lot of time and angst and avoided the rather confused and hostile environment the Park representatives found themselves in. Gordon Watson stated that it was never the NPA’s intention to mislead the community or not respond to questions and said he could only apologise if things had been missed in how they responded to responses and they hoped to learn lessons from it, with regards to how they handle responses in the future.

Many other issues were touched on ,e.g., flooding at the site and the impact on nature; the national criteria for access to affordable housing; house types etc. would depend on agreement between the housing authority and housing association; and that local authority housing needs would dictate. However, it would appear that one of the overriding reasons for selecting Ardentinny as a suitable location for affordable housing was the identification of a suitable site at Lochview.

The Finalised Draft Local Plan consultation begins on Friday 19 February 2010 and closes on Tuesday 6 April 2010. Response forms and all relevant documentation will be on the National Park website at that time. There will also be a Local Plan Drop In Session on 24 February in the Younger Hall, Kilmun.

Related posts:

1. Your Feedback on the Public Meeting with National Park Authority
2. National Park Board unanimously accepts Park’s recommendation to remove Ardentinny housing proposal from Local Plan
3. Community Council meeting

27/11/09: Correspondence between Park Authority and Working Group.

Related posts:

1. Consultation Visit to National Park Headquarters
2. Your Feedback on the Public Meeting with National Park Authority
3. Residents express their views at public meeting

Working Group members at Balloch HQ

Members of Ardentinny Community Council and the Proposed Housing Development Working Group visited Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park HQ on Friday 15th January. There, they were able to study the Park’s consultation documents regarding the proposed affordable housing development south of Lochview in Ardentinny. This provided useful information which has since been fed back to the community, with a view to better informing them prior to the Public Meeting with representatives of the Park Authority which was held in the Village Hall on Tuesday 26th January.

Related posts:

1. Your Feedback on the Public Meeting with National Park Authority
2. Our communities and The National Park
3. National Park Board unanimously accepts Park’s recommendation to remove Ardentinny housing proposal from Local Plan